P.R. (Pedagogical Responsibility) 61824-02-22

In the Regional Court of Learning

Compulsory Education v. The Right to Learn

Motion for Reconsideration of Placement Policy

Gaya

The experts said 'autism'; the system said 'intellectual disability.' In placement committees, Gaya was reduced to a diagnosis, a budget line, and a placement code. To her mother Rita, she was an entire universe waiting for the right key to open.

I saw Rita fight. Speaking of Gaya, she sounded like a military strategist. She saw what committees ignored: how in an ill-fitted school Gaya was lost, regressing, losing bodily control, and harming herself just to feel something touch her.

When all doors slammed shut, Rita took an action the system labeled an offense: she kept Gaya home for an entire year. A year in which Rita served as teacher, therapist, speech therapist, occupational therapist, and mother. She sacrificed her livelihood so Gaya wouldn't have to sacrifice her identity.

Drafting the petition to the District Court, we sought to show how dry laws can wither the children they are meant to nurture. We didn't achieve a sweeping victory or a perfect placement, but within a compromise, a more suitable framework was secured where Gaya could grow in peace. Winning a case is sometimes just a small step in the right direction.